↓ Skip to main content

What form of human-wildlife coexistence is mandated by legislation? A comparative analysis of international and national instruments

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
What form of human-wildlife coexistence is mandated by legislation? A comparative analysis of international and national instruments
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10531-019-01751-6
Authors

Benjamin Cretois, John. D. C. Linnell, Bjørn P. Kaltenborn, Arie Trouwborst

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 66 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 9 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 9 14%
Unknown 14 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 26 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 23%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 5%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 16 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,527,980
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#964
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,074
of 354,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,517 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.