You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Cordyceps sinensis on Stable COPD of GOLD Stages 2–3: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM), April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1155/2019/4903671 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xuhua Yu, Yuquan Mao, Johannah Linda Shergis, Meaghan E. Coyle, Lei Wu, Yuanbin Chen, Anthony Lin Zhang, Lin Lin, Charlie Changli Xue, Yinji Xu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 11% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Researcher | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 21 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,829,318
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#2,663
of 9,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#182,069
of 365,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Evidence-based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (eCAM)
#47
of 222 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,358 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,892 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 222 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.