↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence and causes of vision loss in central Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in International Ophthalmology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Prevalence and causes of vision loss in central Tanzania
Published in
International Ophthalmology, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/bf00224465
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter A. Rapoza, Sheila K. West, Sidney J. Katala, Hugh R. Taylor

Abstract

A population-based survey of the prevalence of major blinding disorders was conducted in three villages in central Tanzania. Overall, 1827 people over the age of seven years old were examined. In those age seven and older, the prevalence of bilateral blindness (visual acuity in the better eye of less than 3/60) was 1.26% and monocular blindness (visual acuity of less than 3/60 in one eye) was 4.32% and the prevalence of visual impairment (visual acuity less than 6/18 but greater than or equal to 3/60 in both eyes was 1.04% and in one eye was 1.75%. Corneal opacities were responsible for 44% of bilateral and 39% of monocular blindness and resulted from trachoma, measles often in association with Vitamin A deficiency, keratoconjunctivitis, and the use of traditional eye medicines. Cataracts accounted for 22% of bilateral and 6% of monocular blindness. Readily preventable or reversible causes of blindness were responsible for 65% of cases of bilateral and 46% of monocular blindness.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 9 23%
Unknown 11 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#7,474,859
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from International Ophthalmology
#123
of 1,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,618
of 213,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Ophthalmology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,033 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.