↓ Skip to main content

The need for healthcare reforms: is no-fault liability the solution to medical malpractice?

Overview of attention for article published in Asian Bioethics Review, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
The need for healthcare reforms: is no-fault liability the solution to medical malpractice?
Published in
Asian Bioethics Review, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s41649-019-00081-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shivkrit Rai, Vishwas H. Devaiah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 20%
Student > Master 3 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 10%
Lecturer 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 15%
Social Sciences 3 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 6 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,039,988
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Asian Bioethics Review
#207
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,886
of 351,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asian Bioethics Review
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.