↓ Skip to main content

Exploring Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Use of Alternative Financial Services: The Moderating Role of Financial Knowledge

Overview of attention for article published in Race and Social Problems, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
Exploring Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Use of Alternative Financial Services: The Moderating Role of Financial Knowledge
Published in
Race and Social Problems, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s12552-019-09259-y
Authors

Kyoung Tae Kim, Jonghee Lee, Jae Min Lee

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 16 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 8 20%
Arts and Humanities 4 10%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 15 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,842,942
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Race and Social Problems
#135
of 251 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,966
of 351,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Race and Social Problems
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 251 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.