You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biomaterial microarrays: rapid, microscale screening of polymer–cell interaction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Materials, January 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2004.11.052 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel G. Anderson, David Putnam, Erin B. Lavik, Tahir A. Mahmood, Robert Langer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 167 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 66 | 35% |
| Researcher | 41 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 39 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 19% |
| Chemistry | 31 | 17% |
| Materials Science | 23 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,799,086
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Materials
#1,161
of 10,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,354
of 157,575 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Materials
#6
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,575 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.