You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Culex species diversity, susceptibility to insecticides and role as potential vector of Lymphatic filariasis in the city of Yaoundé, Cameroon
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007229 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Elysee Nchoutpouen, Abdou Talipouo, Borel Djiappi-Tchamen, Landre Djamouko-Djonkam, Edmond Kopya, Carmene Sandra Ngadjeu, Patricia Doumbe-Belisse, Parfait Awono-Ambene, Sevilor Kekeunou, Charles Sinclair Wondji, Christophe Antonio-Nkondjio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
Chile | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 5% |
Other | 19 | 15% |
Unknown | 59 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 16% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 5% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 2% |
Other | 18 | 14% |
Unknown | 64 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 May 2019.
All research outputs
#14,920,631
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#5,959
of 9,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,999
of 364,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#109
of 177 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 177 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.