You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Coverage‐based consensus calling (CbCC) of short sequence reads and comparison of CbCC results to identify SNPs in chickpea (Cicer arietinum; Fabaceae), a crop species without a reference genome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Botany, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3732/ajb.1100419 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarwar Azam, Vivek Thakur, Pradeep Ruperao, Trushar Shah, Jayashree Balaji, BhanuPrakash Amindala, Andrew D. Farmer, David J. Studholme, Gregory D. May, David Edwards, Jonathan D. G. Jones, Rajeev K. Varshney |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 39% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 4 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 69% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2012.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Botany
#4,104
of 4,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,634
of 259,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Botany
#29
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,542 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.