↓ Skip to main content

Role of nanometer roughness on the adhesion and friction of a rough polymer surface and a molecularly smooth mica surface

Overview of attention for article published in Tribology Letters, January 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
Title
Role of nanometer roughness on the adhesion and friction of a rough polymer surface and a molecularly smooth mica surface
Published in
Tribology Letters, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11249-006-9172-y
Authors

Bruno Zappone, Kenneth J. Rosenberg, Jacob Israelachvili

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 73 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 29%
Researcher 17 22%
Professor 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 22 28%
Materials Science 17 22%
Chemistry 8 10%
Physics and Astronomy 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,756,853
of 23,578,918 outputs
Outputs from Tribology Letters
#94
of 552 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,306
of 160,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tribology Letters
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,578,918 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 552 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them