| Title |
Influence of nitriding gases on the growth of boron nitride nanotubes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Materials Science, January 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10853-006-0381-4 |
| Authors |
Jun Yu, Bill C. P. Li, Jin Zou, Ying Chen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 6 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 19% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 6 | 29% |
| Engineering | 5 | 24% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 14% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 4 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,446,629
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Materials Science
#335
of 4,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,045
of 171,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Materials Science
#6
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,988 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.