You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
GAD65 Antigen Therapy in Recently Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1107096 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Johnny Ludvigsson, David Krisky, Rosaura Casas, Tadej Battelino, Luis Castaño, James Greening, Olga Kordonouri, Timo Otonkoski, Paolo Pozzilli, Jean-Jacques Robert, Henk J Veeze, Jerry Palmer, Ulf Samuelsson, Helena Elding Larsson, Jan Åman, Gunilla Kärdell, Jan Neiderud Helsingborg, Göran Lundström, Eva Albinsson, Annelie Carlsson, Maria Nordvall, Hans Fors, Carl-Göran Arvidsson, Stig Edvardson, Ragnar Hanås, Karin Larsson, Björn Rathsman, Henrik Forsgren, Helena Desaix, Gun Forsander, Nils-Östen Nilsson, Carl-Göran Åkesson, Päivi Keskinen, Riitta Veijola, Timo Talvitie, Klemens Raile, Thomas Kapellen, Walter Burger, Andreas Neu, Ilse Engelsberger, Bettina Heidtmann, Suzanne Bechtold, David Leslie, Francesco Chiarelli, Alesandro Cicognani, Giuseppe Chiumello, Franco Cerutti, Gian Vincenzo Zuccotti, Ana Gomez Gila, Itxaso Rica, Raquel Barrio, Maria Clemente, Maria José López Garcia, Mercedes Rodriguez, Isabel Gonzalez, Juan Pedro Lopez, Mirentxu Oyarzabal, H M Reeser, Roos Nuboer, Pauline Stouthart, Natasa Bratina, Nina Bratanic, Marc de Kerdanet, Jacques Weill, Nicole Ser, Pascal Barat, Anne Marie Bertrand, Jean-Claude Carel, Rachel Reynaud, Regis Coutant, Sabine Baron |
| Abstract |
The 65-kD isoform of glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) is a major autoantigen in type 1 diabetes. We hypothesized that alum-formulated GAD65 (GAD-alum) can preserve beta-cell function in patients with recent-onset type 1 diabetes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 36% |
| Mexico | 1 | 7% |
| Palestine, State of | 1 | 7% |
| Chile | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 36% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 163 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
| Researcher | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 14 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,845,911
of 25,382,250 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#13,077
of 32,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,170
of 257,694 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#152
of 288 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 121.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,694 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 288 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.