↓ Skip to main content

Parental Correlates of Physical Activity in Children and Early Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Sports Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
4 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
518 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
457 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Parental Correlates of Physical Activity in Children and Early Adolescents
Published in
Sports Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.2165/00007256-200636010-00006
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabrina L. Gustafson, Ryan E. Rhodes

Abstract

This article is intended to unite the existing research on parental influences on children's physical activity behaviours in order to establish direction for future research and improve existing child physical activity intervention programmes. A comprehensive, 34-study review of parental correlates of child physical activity was conducted and six variables were examined. There were significant correlations found between parental support and child physical activity level. Results for an association between parental and child physical activity levels, however, were mixed. There were not enough studies to draw conclusions about single-parent families, family socioeconomic status and ethnicity. Finally, there were some weak inter- and intra-generational sex correlations, but these results were mostly inconclusive. Possible mechanisms, including parental support, modelling, shared activities, societal differences by generation, minority groups and genetics are discussed, and recommendations are made on translating experimental results into tangible intervention efforts essential for disease prevention through increased physical activity.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 457 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 <1%
France 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 441 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 17%
Student > Bachelor 58 13%
Researcher 40 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 7%
Other 82 18%
Unknown 87 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 112 25%
Social Sciences 62 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 46 10%
Psychology 42 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 7%
Other 50 11%
Unknown 115 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2022.
All research outputs
#1,856,637
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Sports Medicine
#1,326
of 2,901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,965
of 292,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sports Medicine
#130
of 529 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 57.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 529 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.