Title |
Cervical cancer: the increasing incidence of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in younger women.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, April 2001
|
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
S Liu, R Semenciw, Y Mao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 4 | 6% |
Australia | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 66 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 21% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Other | 14 | 20% |
Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 54% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 12 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,981,634
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#2,313
of 9,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,591
of 42,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#7
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,531 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.