↓ Skip to main content

‘Ought’ implies ‘can’ against epistemic deontologism: beyond doxastic involuntarism

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
‘Ought’ implies ‘can’ against epistemic deontologism: beyond doxastic involuntarism
Published in
Synthese, August 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11229-017-1531-8
Authors

Charles Côté-Bouchard

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 56%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 10 63%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,568,386
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#1,539
of 2,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,428
of 317,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#24
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,499 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.