You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Efficacy of Combined VEGFR1-3, PDGFα/β, and FGFR1-3 Blockade Using Nintedanib for Esophagogastric Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Cancer Research, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-3789 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Won, Azfar Basunia, Walid K. Chatila, Jaclyn F. Hechtman, Joanne F. Chou, Geoffrey Y. Ku, Sree B. Chalasani, Michelle S. Boyar, Zoe Goldberg, Avni M. Desai, Yaelle Tuvy, Michael F. Berger, Laura Tang, David P. Kelsen, Mark Schattner, David H. Ilson, Marinela Capanu, David B. Solit, Nikolaus Schultz, Yelena Y. Janjigian |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 31% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Japan | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 63% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 11% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,202,276
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#3,866
of 12,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,384
of 349,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#81
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.