| Title |
Wired for musical rhythm? A diffusion MRI-based study of individual differences in music perception
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brain Structure and Function, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00429-019-01868-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Archith Rajan, Jeffrey M. Valla, Jacob Antony Alappatt, Megha Sharda, Apurva Shah, Madhura Ingalhalikar, Nandini C. Singh |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| India | 1 | 13% |
| Denmark | 1 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 31% |
| Researcher | 6 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 9 | 26% |
| Psychology | 7 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2020.
All research outputs
#5,071,995
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Brain Structure and Function
#387
of 1,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,139
of 355,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Structure and Function
#7
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.