You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Risk Factors and Prevalence of Deep Vein Thrombosis After the 2016 Kumamoto Earthquakes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Circulation Journal, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-18-1369 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Koji Sato, Kenji Sakamoto, Yoichiro Hashimoto, Kazuhiko Hanzawa, Daisuke Sueta, Sunao Kojima, Masaya Fukuda, Hiroki Usuku, Fumie Kihara, Hiroshi Hosokawa, Yohei Nagai, Makoto Nakajima, Yoshiharu Saito, Kayoko Sakai, Sumio Masunaga, Shinji Tanaka, Kazuteru Fujimoto, Kenji Morihisa, Katsuo Noda, Kazuhiro Nishigami, Kohei Nagata, Koichiro Fujisue, Noriaki Tabata, Yukio Ando, Kenichi Tsujita, Hisao Ogawa, Seiji Hokimoto, on behalf of the KEEP Project |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 16% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2020.
All research outputs
#16,588,625
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#1,349
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,338
of 365,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#9
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.