You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Candidate traits in elections: when good news for selection is bad news for accountability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Political Science Research and Methods, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1017/psrm.2019.6 |
| Authors |
Keith Schnakenberg |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 27% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 47% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 47% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 2 | 18% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 9% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 64% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#4,197,567
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Political Science Research and Methods
#255
of 545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,370
of 364,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Political Science Research and Methods
#10
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 545 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.