| Title |
Strengthening primary care: addressing the disparity between vertical and horizontal investment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp08x263721 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan De Maeseneer, Chris van Weel, David Egilman, Khaya Mfenyana, Arthur Kaufman, Nelson Sewankambo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 1% |
| Bhutan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 18% |
| Researcher | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 31% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 13% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,096,867
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#534
of 4,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,410
of 156,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#1
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.