↓ Skip to main content

Diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in urban Indigenous adults: Results from the DRUID study

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in urban Indigenous adults: Results from the DRUID study
Published in
Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice, March 2008
DOI 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.02.008
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kerin O’Dea, Joan Cunningham, Louise Maple-Brown, Tarun Weeramanthri, Jonathan Shaw, Terry Dunbar, Paul Zimmet

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Switzerland 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 46 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 9 18%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Student > Master 5 10%
Other 10 20%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 42%
Social Sciences 8 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 5 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2013.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#1,166
of 3,191 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,656
of 95,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetes Research & Clinical Practice
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,191 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,853 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.