You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimisation Modelling to Assess Cost of Dietary Improvement in Remote Aboriginal Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0083587 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julie Brimblecombe, Megan Ferguson, Selma C. Liberato, Kerin O'Dea, Malcolm Riley |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2020.
All research outputs
#2,708,907
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#34,576
of 194,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,918
of 304,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#954
of 5,434 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,808 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,434 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.