| Title |
Acute effects of different set configurations during a strength-oriented resistance training session on barbell velocity and the force–velocity relationship in resistance-trained males and females
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-019-04131-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alejandro Torrejón, Danica Janicijevic, Guy Gregory Haff, Amador García-Ramos |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 6 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Norway | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 6% |
| Brazil | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 116 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Researcher | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 49 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 36 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2021.
All research outputs
#3,411,502
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#1,026
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,132
of 365,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#15
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.