| Title |
Comparative landscape genetics of two endemic torrent salamander species, Rhyacotriton kezeri and R. variegatus: implications for forest management and species conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-019-01172-6 |
| Authors |
Sarah L. Emel, Deanna H. Olson, L. Lacey Knowles, Andrew Storfer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 11 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,378,545
of 25,460,285 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#237
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,493
of 366,017 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#13
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,460,285 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,017 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.