You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deep Genome Resequencing Reveals Artificial and Natural Selection for Visual Deterioration, Plateau Adaptability and High Prolificacy in Chinese Domestic Sheep
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2019.00300 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Weimin Wang, Xiaoxue Zhang, Xiang Zhou, Yangzi Zhang, Yongfu La, Yu Zhang, Chong Li, Youzhang Zhao, Fadi Li, Bang Liu, Zhihua Jiang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 15% |
| Professor | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,568,386
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#5,536
of 12,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,120
of 351,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#192
of 350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,179 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.