| Title |
Patterns and drivers of vertical movements of the large fishes of the epipelagic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11160-019-09555-1 |
| Authors |
Samantha Andrzejaczek, Adrian C. Gleiss, Charitha B. Pattiaratchi, Mark G. Meekan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 15 | 28% |
| United States | 7 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 60% |
| Scientists | 20 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 122 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 10% |
| Unknown | 32 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Unknown | 36 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2019.
All research outputs
#1,271,529
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#54
of 640 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,223
of 366,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 640 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.