You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Development of highly pure α-helical lipoglycopeptides as self-adjuvanting vaccines
|
---|---|
Published in |
Tetrahedron, April 2009
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.tet.2009.02.060 |
Authors |
Wei Zhong, Mariusz Skwarczynski, Pavla Simerska, Michael F. Good, Istvan Toth |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 10 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 2 | 18% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 18% |
Researcher | 2 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 18% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
Other | 2 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 8 | 73% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 9% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 9% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,926,975
of 25,782,917 outputs
Outputs from Tetrahedron
#141
of 11,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,396
of 108,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tetrahedron
#2
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,182 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.