| Title |
Understanding the Sociocultural Drivers of Urban Bushmeat Consumption for Behavior Change Interventions in Pointe Noire, Republic of Congo
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Ecology, March 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10745-019-0061-z |
| Authors |
Alexandre M. Chausson, J. Marcus Rowcliffe, Lucie Escouflaire, Michelle Wieland, Juliet H. Wright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 20% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Congo | 1 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| Cambodia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 67% |
| Scientists | 14 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 137 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 137 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
| Researcher | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 50 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 11% |
| Unknown | 53 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 146. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2024.
All research outputs
#289,362
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Human Ecology
#7
of 830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,450
of 380,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Ecology
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.