| Title |
Utilitarianism and the ethical foundations of cost-effectiveness analysis in resource allocation for global health
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13010-019-0074-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elliot Marseille, James G. Kahn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Peru | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 205 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 38 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 7% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Unknown | 79 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 41 | 20% |
| Unknown | 83 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,182,176
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#53
of 235 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,550
of 365,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 235 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.