| Title |
Why Content and Cognition Matter: Integrating Conceptual Knowledge to Support Simulation-Based Procedural Skills Transfer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of General Internal Medicine, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11606-019-04959-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey J. H. Cheung, Kulamakan M. Kulasegaram, Nicole N. Woods, Ryan Brydges |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 27% |
| United States | 3 | 14% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 41% |
| Scientists | 7 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 19 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Psychology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 15% |
| Unknown | 27 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,076,932
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#2,178
of 8,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,353
of 367,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#54
of 173 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,256 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 173 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.