| Title |
The role of proactive interference in working memory training and transfer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Psychological Research, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00426-019-01172-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas S. Redick, Elizabeth A. Wiemers, Randall W. Engle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 25% |
| Portugal | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 38% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 21 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 9% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,745,767
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Research
#106
of 982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,496
of 353,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Research
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.