↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of two numerical approaches (DEM and MPM) applied to unsteady flow

Overview of attention for article published in Computational Particle Mechanics, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Comparison of two numerical approaches (DEM and MPM) applied to unsteady flow
Published in
Computational Particle Mechanics, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40571-019-00236-1
Authors

Fabio Gracia, Pascal Villard, Vincent Richefeu

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 46%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 15%
Materials Science 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#20,564,621
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Computational Particle Mechanics
#180
of 294 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,106
of 351,802 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computational Particle Mechanics
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 294 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,802 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.