↓ Skip to main content

Sentinel Lymph Nodes Containing Very Small (<0.1 mm) Deposits of Metastatic Melanoma Cannot Be Safely Regarded as Tumor-Negative

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Sentinel Lymph Nodes Containing Very Small (<0.1 mm) Deposits of Metastatic Melanoma Cannot Be Safely Regarded as Tumor-Negative
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2012
DOI 10.1245/s10434-011-2208-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rajmohan Murali, Chitra DeSilva, Stanley W. McCarthy, John F. Thompson, Richard A. Scolyer

Abstract

Some authors have suggested that patients with very small (<0.1 mm) deposits of metastatic melanoma in sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) should be considered SLN-negative, whereas others have reported that such patients can have adverse long-term outcomes. The aims of the present study were to determine whether extensive sectioning of SLNs resulted in more accurate categorization of histologic features of tumor deposits and to assess prognostic associations of histologic parameters obtained using more intensive sectioning protocols.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Other 4 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 55%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 23%