↓ Skip to main content

Protective Effectiveness of Various Types of Helmets in Motorcycle Accidents

Overview of attention for article published in NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 1999
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#42 of 279)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protective Effectiveness of Various Types of Helmets in Motorcycle Accidents
Published in
NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI, January 1999
DOI 10.3893/jjaam.10.717
Authors

Manabu Nemoto, Yoji Sato, Hideaki Goto, Yusuke Sawada, Tetsuo Yukioka, Hiroharu Matsuda, Shuji Shimazaki

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 July 2019.
All research outputs
#6,876,021
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#42
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,573
of 109,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NIHON KYUKYU IGAKUKAI ZASSHI
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.