| Title |
A Stabilizing and Destabilizing Social World: Close Relationships and Recovery Processes in SUD
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40737-019-00137-9 |
| Authors |
Marius Veseth, Christian Moltu, Thomas Solgaard Svendsen, Sverre Nesvåg, Tale Ekeroth Slyngstad, Alexander Waagan Skaalevik, Jone Bjornestad |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 43% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 2 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,128,159
of 24,855,923 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health
#7
of 151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,824
of 358,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,855,923 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them