| Title |
A step beyond the hygiene hypothesis—immune-mediated classes determined in a population-based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12916-019-1311-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vladeta Ajdacic-Gross, Margot Mutsch, Stephanie Rodgers, Anja Tesic, Mario Müller, Erich Seifritz, En-Young N. Wagner, Roland von Känel, Markus A. Landolt, Nina Steinemann, Viktor von Wyl, Enrique Castelao, Marie-Pierre F. Strippoli, Jennifer Glaus, Caroline Vandeleur, Pedro M. Marques-Vidal, Peter Vollenweider, Martin Preisig |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 6% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 25% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 45 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 16% |
| Psychology | 14 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 49 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 114. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2019.
All research outputs
#375,156
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#299
of 4,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,154
of 370,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#11
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,076 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.