↓ Skip to main content

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM)

Overview of attention for article published in PharmacoEconomics - Open, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy Versus Standard Combination Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-1 Infected Patients with Viral Suppression in France (ANRS 140 DREAM)
Published in
PharmacoEconomics - Open, April 2019
DOI 10.1007/s41669-019-0130-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Osvaldo Ulises Garay, Marie Libérée Nishimwe, Marwân-al-Qays Bousmah, Asmaa Janah, Pierre-Marie Girard, Geneviève Chêne, Laetitia Moinot, Luis Sagaon-Teyssier, Jean-Luc Meynard, Bruno Spire, Sylvie Boyer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 26%
Researcher 9 26%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Professor 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 15%
Engineering 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#18,676,383
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from PharmacoEconomics - Open
#246
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,030
of 352,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PharmacoEconomics - Open
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.