| Title |
Facilitated group work for people with long-term conditions: a systematic review of benefits from studies of group-work interventions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x702233 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Margaret Jackson, Daniel Jones, Judith Dyson, Una Macleod |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 86% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 23 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 15% |
| Psychology | 5 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 23 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,740,906
of 24,775,802 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#853
of 4,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,151
of 358,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#26
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,775,802 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,611 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.