You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Association of HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis With Incidence of Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Individuals at High Risk of HIV Infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1001/jama.2019.2947 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael W. Traeger, Vincent J. Cornelisse, Jason Asselin, Brian Price, Norman J. Roth, Jeff Willcox, Ban Kiem Tee, Christopher K. Fairley, Christina C. Chang, Jude Armishaw, Olga Vujovic, Matthew Penn, Pauline Cundill, George Forgan-Smith, John Gall, Claire Pickett, Luxi Lal, Anne Mak, Tim D. Spelman, Long Nguyen, Dean A. Murphy, Kathleen E. Ryan, Carol El-Hayek, Michael West, Simon Ruth, Colin Batrouney, John T. Lockwood, Jennifer F. Hoy, Margaret E. Hellard, Mark A. Stoové, Edwina J. Wright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 173 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 32 | 18% |
| Mexico | 20 | 12% |
| Australia | 10 | 6% |
| France | 7 | 4% |
| Hong Kong | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 5 | 3% |
| Norway | 2 | 1% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 22 | 13% |
| Unknown | 61 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 132 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 24 | 14% |
| Scientists | 15 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 391 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 391 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 12% |
| Researcher | 45 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 71 | 18% |
| Unknown | 137 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 33 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 12 | 3% |
| Other | 68 | 17% |
| Unknown | 153 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 244. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#155,712
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,317
of 36,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,142
of 367,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#52
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,749 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.