| Title |
Toad’s tongue for breakfast: exploitation of a novel prey type, the invasive cane toad, by scavenging raptors in tropical Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, November 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-010-9903-8 |
| Authors |
Christa Beckmann, Richard Shine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 62 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 17 | 27% |
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 60 | 97% |
| Scientists | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 44 | 54% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 1% |
| Psychology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 84. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 November 2022.
All research outputs
#514,035
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#47
of 2,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,444
of 115,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,548 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.