↓ Skip to main content

Survey on Using Ethical Principles in Environmental Field Research with Place-Based Communities

Overview of attention for article published in Science and Engineering Ethics, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Survey on Using Ethical Principles in Environmental Field Research with Place-Based Communities
Published in
Science and Engineering Ethics, January 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11948-017-9981-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dianne Quigley, Alana Levine, David A. Sonnenfeld, Phil Brown, Qing Tian, Xiaofan Wei

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 5 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 11%
Environmental Science 3 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 17 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#15,687,152
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#715
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,640
of 449,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,007 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.