↓ Skip to main content

White matter hyperintensities in vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID): Knowledge gaps and opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
264 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
376 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
White matter hyperintensities in vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID): Knowledge gaps and opportunities
Published in
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions, April 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.trci.2019.02.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jessica Alber, Suvarna Alladi, Hee‐Joon Bae, David A. Barton, Laurel A. Beckett, Joanne M. Bell, Sara E. Berman, Geert Jan Biessels, Sandra E. Black, Isabelle Bos, Gene L. Bowman, Emanuele Brai, Adam M. Brickman, Brandy L. Callahan, Roderick A. Corriveau, Silvia Fossati, Rebecca F. Gottesman, Deborah R. Gustafson, Vladimir Hachinski, Kathleen M. Hayden, Alex M. Helman, Timothy M. Hughes, Jeremy D. Isaacs, Angela L. Jefferson, Sterling C. Johnson, Alifiya Kapasi, Silke Kern, Jay C. Kwon, Juraj Kukolja, Athene Lee, Samuel N. Lockhart, Anne Murray, Katie E. Osborn, Melinda C. Power, Brittani R. Price, Hanneke F.M. Rhodius‐Meester, Jacqueline A. Rondeau, Allyson C. Rosen, Douglas L. Rosene, Julie A. Schneider, Henrieta Scholtzova, C. Elizabeth Shaaban, Narlon C.B.S. Silva, Heather M. Snyder, Walter Swardfager, Aron M. Troen, Susanne J. van Veluw, Prashanthi Vemuri, Anders Wallin, Cheryl Wellington, Donna M. Wilcock, Sharon Xiangwen Xie, Atticus H. Hainsworth

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 376 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 34 9%
Student > Master 31 8%
Other 21 6%
Other 68 18%
Unknown 117 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 77 20%
Neuroscience 65 17%
Psychology 20 5%
Engineering 14 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 3%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 140 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,092,984
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
#101
of 699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,210
of 366,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.