↓ Skip to main content

An Improved Parameter Estimation Method for Hodgkin-Huxley Models

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Computational Neuroscience, March 1999
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An Improved Parameter Estimation Method for Hodgkin-Huxley Models
Published in
Journal of Computational Neuroscience, March 1999
DOI 10.1023/a:1008880518515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allan R. Willms, Deborah J. Baro, Ronald M. Harris-Warrick, John Guckenheimer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
Spain 3 3%
France 3 3%
United States 3 3%
Germany 2 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 95 83%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 23%
Student > Master 19 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Student > Bachelor 6 5%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 11 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 23%
Neuroscience 18 16%
Engineering 18 16%
Mathematics 10 9%
Computer Science 10 9%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#181
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,314
of 35,889 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Computational Neuroscience
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,889 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.