Title |
Weak evidence for determinants of citation frequency in ecological articles
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientometrics, May 2010
|
DOI | 10.1007/s11192-010-0231-7 |
Authors |
André Andrian Padial, João Carlos Nabout, Tadeu Siqueira, Luis Mauricio Bini, José Alexandre Felizola Diniz-Filho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 21 | 15% |
Spain | 2 | 1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Ghana | 1 | <1% |
Czechia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Croatia | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 112 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
Professor | 11 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Other | 36 | 26% |
Unknown | 24 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 32% |
Environmental Science | 25 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 7% |
Computer Science | 6 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Unknown | 32 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#5,842,942
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#1,028
of 2,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,006
of 96,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.