↓ Skip to main content

How Should Students Learn in the School Science Laboratory? The Benefits of Cooperative Learning

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Science Education, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
How Should Students Learn in the School Science Laboratory? The Benefits of Cooperative Learning
Published in
Research in Science Education, July 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11165-017-9618-2
Authors

Ayala Raviv, Sarit Cohen, Ester Aflalo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Lecturer 10 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Researcher 9 8%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 55 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 14 12%
Chemistry 6 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 24 20%
Unknown 62 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2019.
All research outputs
#18,676,383
of 23,140,503 outputs
Outputs from Research in Science Education
#499
of 662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,456
of 312,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Science Education
#38
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,140,503 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 662 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.