↓ Skip to main content

An ancient genomic regulatory block conserved across bilaterians and its dismantling in tetrapods by retrogene replacement

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Research, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
An ancient genomic regulatory block conserved across bilaterians and its dismantling in tetrapods by retrogene replacement
Published in
Genome Research, January 2012
DOI 10.1101/gr.132233.111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ignacio Maeso, Manuel Irimia, Juan J. Tena, Esther González-Pérez, David Tran, Vydianathan Ravi, Byrappa Venkatesh, Sonsoles Campuzano, José Luis Gómez-Skarmeta, Jordi Garcia-Fernàndez

Abstract

Developmental genes are regulated by complex, distantly located cis-regulatory modules (CRMs), often forming genomic regulatory blocks (GRBs) that are conserved among vertebrates and among insects. We have investigated GRBs associated with Iroquois homeobox genes in 39 metazoans. Despite 600 million years of independent evolution, Iroquois genes are linked to ankyrin-repeat-containing Sowah genes in nearly all studied bilaterians. We show that Iroquois-specific CRMs populate the Sowah locus, suggesting that regulatory constraints underlie the maintenance of the Iroquois-Sowah syntenic block. Surprisingly, tetrapod Sowah orthologs are intronless and not associated with Iroquois; however, teleost and elephant shark data demonstrate that this is a derived feature, and that many Iroquois-CRMs were ancestrally located within Sowah introns. Retroposition, gene, and genome duplication have allowed selective elimination of Sowah exons from the Iroquois regulatory landscape while keeping associated CRMs, resulting in large associated gene deserts. These results highlight the importance of CRMs in imposing constraints to genome architecture, even across large phylogenetic distances, and of gene duplication-mediated genetic redundancy to disentangle these constraints, increasing genomic plasticity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 6%
Spain 3 4%
Japan 2 3%
Canada 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Singapore 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 57 80%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 39%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Engineering 4 6%
Computer Science 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 10 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2012.
All research outputs
#15,931,213
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from Genome Research
#3,938
of 4,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,127
of 249,925 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Research
#41
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 249,925 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.