You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Systematic review and survey of Neisseria gonorrhoeae ceftriaxone and azithromycin susceptibility data in the Asia Pacific, 2011 to 2016
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2019
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0213312 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
C. R. Robert George, Rodney P. Enriquez, Barrie J. Gatus, David M. Whiley, Ying-Ru Lo, Naoko Ishikawa, Teodora Wi, Monica M. Lahra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 6 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 24% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
Scientists | 6 | 29% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 7 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Researcher | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 16% |
Unknown | 31 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 4% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 13% |
Unknown | 33 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2019.
All research outputs
#2,334,349
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#28,402
of 224,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,679
of 365,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#509
of 2,898 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,898 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.