↓ Skip to main content

Basking and torpor in a rock-dwelling desert marsupial: survival strategies in a resource-poor environment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Comparative Physiology B, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Basking and torpor in a rock-dwelling desert marsupial: survival strategies in a resource-poor environment
Published in
Journal of Comparative Physiology B, August 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00360-007-0186-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fritz Geiser, Chris R. Pavey

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 55 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 6 10%
Professor 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 10 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 69%
Environmental Science 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 9 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,135,326
of 24,395,432 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#236
of 840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,684
of 69,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Comparative Physiology B
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,395,432 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.