You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Strategies for tackling Taenia solium taeniosis/cysticercosis: A systematic review and comparison of transmission models, including an assessment of the wider Taeniidae family transmission models
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pntd.0007301 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew A. Dixon, Uffe C. Braae, Peter Winskill, Martin Walker, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Sarah Gabriël, Maria-Gloria Basáñez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 35% |
| Germany | 1 | 6% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Scientists | 5 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 39 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 16 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 41 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,550,337
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#1,712
of 9,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,263
of 366,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#39
of 186 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 186 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.