| Title |
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled investigation of BCc1 nanomedicine effect on survival and quality of life in metastatic and non-metastatic gastric cancer patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-019-0484-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maryam Hafizi, Somayeh Kalanaky, Hassan moaiery, Maryam Khayamzadeh, Sajad Noorian, Vahid Kaveh, Behrooz Gharib, Hossein Foudazi, Mohsen Razavi, Arash Jenabian, Saeid Salimi, Mohammad Mahdi Adib Sereshki, Hamid Reza Mirzaei, Afshin Zarghi, Saideh Fakharzadeh, Mohammad Hassan Nazaran, Mohammad Esmaeil Akbari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| South Africa | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 32 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,258,829
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#497
of 1,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,478
of 370,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#8
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,994 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 370,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.