You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Podcast-as-Method?: Critical Reflections on Using Podcasts to Produce Geographic Knowledge
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Geographical Review, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1111/gere.12354 |
| Authors |
Eden Kinkaid, Kelsey Emard, Nari Senanayake |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Turkey | 1 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 71% |
| Scientists | 5 | 21% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 23% |
| Arts and Humanities | 8 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 33 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#2,198,261
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Geographical Review
#37
of 912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,662
of 375,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geographical Review
#26
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.